ركن السؤال و الأجابة 2

[mahrousahmed]

أتمنى من مستر محمد ان يتقبل اعتذارى فاجاباته صحيحه تماما ( فلقد قمت بسؤال موقع اللونجمان وكانت ردودة كالتالى)

A relative clause follows a noun (or sometimes a whole clause, referring to the whole clause). In both of these examples, you are trying to put a relative clause after an adjective (good in the first sentence, useful in the second). In the first, the pronoun it does not refer to breakfast but to the whole clause I usually have a big breakfast. That fact is what is good, not the breakfast itself. In the second, this does not refer to the Nile but to the whole clause The Nile used to flood. In both of these sentences, the subordinator in that is needed and a preposition + which does not work.

اما بالنسبة لجملة biography :

When you have the structure I prefer X to Y, X and Y have to be completely different. One cannot be a subset of the other. Escapism is a type of fiction, so it cannot be the answer. Literature is a broader category, of which fiction and non-fiction are subsets. Fraction, of course, makes no sense here. The only possible answer is biography because it is a type of non-fiction.

اما بالنسبة لجملة if you listen to that loud music

It seems to me that the speaker knows that the listener already has a headache (a headache can't get worse if it doesn't exist), and this music seems to refer to music that is being played at that time when the speaker says this. My guess is that a first conditional is intended

اما بالنسبة لجملة They've widened the road.....

Done is the past participle, here used as an adjective. You can use past participles alone that way but not participles with other verbs. For that you need to use a relative. You can say the best thing done or the best thing that/which has been done or the best thing that/which was done. The best thing that/which is done can be used in other sentences but it doesn’t make sense here. In short, if you don’t have a relative, you need the participle by itself.

اما بالنسبة لجملة spun \ leaked

A water wheel spins when there is enough water flowing under it to make it move. If the water levels are low, it won’t spin on its own. So if there is heavy rain, that will make the water wheel spin.
Why would rain make it leak? Something leaks when there is a hole or ***** so that liquid or gas can get in or out, usually by fault or mistake. A water wheel picks water up and pours it into some sort of channel. It doesn’t let water out unintentionally through a *****, so why would heavy rain make a water wheel do so? The only correct word here is spun.

هذا وكل تحية وتقدير للاستاذ ديوشى والاختلاف فى الراى لا يفسد للود قضية والمهم ان طلابنا توصلهم المعلومة صح

[Mr.Nashaat Elhamaki]

بارك الله فيكم اخى الكريم
وكلامك هذا من شيم الكرام
اما بالنسبه للجمل موضوع النقاش
فنشكرك على ما تقدمت به من كلام طيب

[مستر محمد ديوشي عطا]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة mahrousahmed

أتمنى من مستر محمد ان يتقبل اعتذارى فاجاباته صحيحه تماما ( فلقد قمت بسؤال موقع اللونجمان وكانت ردودة كالتالى)

a relative clause follows a noun (or sometimes a whole clause, referring to the whole clause). In both of these examples, you are trying to put a relative clause after an adjective (good in the first sentence, useful in the second). In the first, the pronoun it does not refer to breakfast but to the whole clause i usually have a big breakfast. That fact is what is good, not the breakfast itself. In the second, this does not refer to the nile but to the whole clause the nile used to flood. In both of these sentences, the subordinator in that is needed and a preposition + which does not work.

اما بالنسبة لجملة biography :

when you have the structure i prefer x to y, x and y have to be completely different. One cannot be a subset of the other. escapism is a type of fiction, so it cannot be the answer. literature is a broader category, of which fiction and non-fiction are subsets. fraction, of course, makes no sense here. The only possible answer is biography because it is a type of non-fiction.

اما بالنسبة لجملة if you listen to that loud music

it seems to me that the speaker knows that the listener already has a headache (a headache can't get worse if it doesn't exist), and this music seems to refer to music that is being played at that time when the speaker says this. My guess is that a first conditional is intended

اما بالنسبة لجملة they've widened the road.....

done is the past participle, here used as an adjective. You can use past participles alone that way but not participles with other verbs. For that you need to use a relative. You can say the best thing done or the best thing that/which has been done or the best thing that/which was done. The best thing that/which is done can be used in other sentences but it doesn’t make sense here. In short, if you don’t have a relative, you need the participle by itself.

اما بالنسبة لجملة spun \ leaked

a water wheel spins when there is enough water flowing under it to make it move. If the water levels are low, it won’t spin on its own. So if there is heavy rain, that will make the water wheel spin.
why would rain make it leak? Something leaks when there is a hole or ***** so that liquid or gas can get in or out, usually by fault or mistake. A water wheel picks water up and pours it into some sort of channel. It doesn’t let water out unintentionally through a *****, so why would heavy rain make a water wheel do so? The only correct word here is spun.

هذا وكل تحية وتقدير للاستاذ ديوشى والاختلاف فى الراى لا يفسد للود قضية والمهم ان طلابنا توصلهم المعلومة صح

لست بحاجة للأعتذار أخي الفاضل فكلنا طلاب علم ، وكل كلام يؤخذ منه ويرد الا كلام الله عز وجل وأحاديث الرسول صلي الله عليه وسلم ..... خالص التحية و التقدير لحضرتك و نتمي دوام المشاركة